Government subsidy for remanufacturing or carbon tax rebate: Which is better for firms and a low-carbon economy

41Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The government as a policy maker wishing to promote remanufacturing and proper disposal of hazardous old products which are harmful to environment has taken many actions, ranging from carbon regulation and financial incentives such as trade-in subsidy. However, carbon tax can result in loss of profit for firms to some degree, so the government has to give other subsidy to balance the profits and carbon emission. Thus, this article investigates two subsidy mechanisms: remanufacturing subsidy or tax rebate. The optimal pricing and production decision under these policies are examined. Our results show that carbon tax has a great impact on pricing strategies. Trade-in subsidy can encourage customers to replace their existing products with new and remanufactured products. Both remanufacture subsidy and tax rebate are beneficial to manufacturer and can further promote remanufacturing development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shu, T., Peng, Z., Chen, S., Wang, S., Lai, K. K., & Yang, H. (2017). Government subsidy for remanufacturing or carbon tax rebate: Which is better for firms and a low-carbon economy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010156

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free