Quasi-stationary waves in the Southern Hemisphere during El Niño and La Niña events

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.


Characteristics of quasi-stationary (QS) waves in the Southern Hemisphere are discussed using 49 years (1950-1998) of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data. A comparison between the stationary wave amplitudes and phases between the recent data (1979-1998) and the entire 49 years data showed that the differences are not large and the 49 years data can be used for the study. Using the 49 years of data it is found that the amplitude of QS wave 1 has two maxima in the upper atmosphere, one at 30° S and the other at 55° S. QS waves 2 and 3 have much less amplitude. Monthly variation of the amplitude of QS wave, 1 shows that it is highest in October, particularly in the upper troposphere and stratosphere. To examine the QS wave propagation Plumb's methodology is used. A comparison of Eliassen-Palm fluxes for El Niño and La Niña events showed that during El Niño events there is a stronger upward and equatorward propagation of QS waves, particularly in the austral spring. Higher upward propagation indicates higher energy transport. A clear wave train can be identified at 300 hPa in all the seasons except in summer. The horizontal component of wave activity flux in the El Niño composite seems to be a Rossby wave propagating along a Rossby wave guide, at first poleward until it reaches its turning latitude in the Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes, then equatorward in the vicinity of South America. The position of the center of positive anomalies in the austral spring in the El Niño years over the southeast Pacific, near South America, favors the occurrence of blocking highs in this region. This agrees with a recent numerical study by Renwick and Revell (1999). © European Geosciences Union 2004.




Brahmananda Rao, V., Fernandez, J. P. R., & Franchito, S. H. (2004). Quasi-stationary waves in the Southern Hemisphere during El Niño and La Niña events. Annales Geophysicae, 22(3), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-789-2004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free