Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov.

70Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The recently proposed new phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov. is validly published in order to facilitate its use in future discussions of the ecology, biology, and phylogenetic relationships of the constituent organisms. This name is preferred over the previously tentatively proposed "Rozellida" as new data suggest that the life-style and morphology of Rozella is not representative of the large radiation to which it and other Cryptomycota belong. Furthermore, taxa at higher ranks such as phylum are considered better not based on individual names of included genera, but rather on some special characteristics - in this case the cryptic nature of this group and that they were initially revealed by molecular methods rather than morphological discovery. If the group were later viewed as a member of a different kingdom, the name should be retained to indicate its fungal affinities, as is the practice for other fungal-like protist groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, M. D. M., Richards, T. A., Hawksworth, D. L., & Bass, D. (2011). Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov. IMA Fungus, 2(2), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.08

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free