The common-place quantification of humanitarian disasters enables rapid and informed crisis responses. In disaster settings, understanding feelings and perceptions regarding individuals’ experiences, livelihood disruptions and coping mechanisms can also be valuable for extending and deepening quantitative insight. This paper explores the potential for diary methods to capture extensive, nuanced data from marginalised groups during a disaster, by drawing upon a study with 100 young diarists (aged 15–29) who produced 1418 diary entries over 4 months. In particular, we share how diary-methods can be designed inclusively, through addressing themes of equitable research partnerships, supporting more vulnerable participants, ensuring data quality, data management, participatory analysis, and budgeting for collaborative research.
CITATION STYLE
Mueller, G., Barford, A., Osborne, H., Pradhan, K., Proefke, R., Shrestha, S., & Pratiwi, A. M. (2023). Disaster Diaries: Qualitative Research at a Distance. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221147163
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.