Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records

76Citations
Citations of this article
144Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) contributes to the knowledge about species distributions, which is a critical foundation in the studies of invasive species, biological conservation, and response to climatic change. In this study, we assessed the value of CS for termites worldwide. First, we compared the abundance and species diversity of geo-tagged termite records in iNaturalist to that of the University of Florida termite collection (UFTC) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Second, we quantified how the combination of these data sources affected the number of genera that satisfy data requirements for ecological niche modeling. Third, we assessed the taxonomic correctness of iNaturalist termite records in the Americas at the genus and family level through expert review based on photo identification. Results showed that iNaturalist records were less abundant than those in the UFTC and in GBIF, although they complemented the latter two in selected world regions. A combination of GBIF and the UFTC led to a significant increase in the number of termite genera satisfying the abundance criterion for niche modeling compared to either of those two sources alone, whereas adding iNaturalist observations as a third source only had a moderate effect on the number of termite genera satisfying that criterion. Although research grade observations in iNaturalist require a community-supported and agreed upon identification (ID) below the family taxonomic rank, our results indicated that iNaturalist data do not exhibit a higher taxonomic classification accuracy when they are designated research grade. This means that non-research grade observations can be used to more completely map the presence of termite locations in certain geographic locations without significantly jeopardizing data quality. We concluded that CS termite observation records can, to some extent, complement expert termite collections in terms of geographic coverage and species diversity. Based on recent data contribution patterns in CS data, the role of CS termite contributions is expected to grow significantly in the near future.

References Powered by Scopus

Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models

5028Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar

2654Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data

2440Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences

201Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Observing the Observers: How Participants Contribute Data to iNaturalist and Implications for Biodiversity Science

138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An overview of the history, current contributions and future outlook of iNaturalist in Australia

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hochmair, H. H., Scheffrahn, R. H., Basille, M., & Boone, M. (2020). Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records. PLoS ONE, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226534

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

63%

Researcher 13

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46

61%

Environmental Science 21

28%

Social Sciences 5

7%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 28

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free