Neostigmine decreases heart rate in heart transplant patients

36Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of neostigmine on heart rate in cardiac transplant patients. Methods: Neostigmine (2.5-50 μg · kg-1) was administered to ASA 1 or 2 patients with normally innervated hearts (controls), and to patients who had undergone recent ( six months before study) cardiac transplantation. Results: Baseline heart rate was 66 ± 3 beats · min-1 in controls (n = 10 mean ± SEM), which was slower than that observed in recently (95 ± 4 beats · min-1, n = 15; P < 0.001) and in remotely (88 ± 3 beats · min-1, n = 16, P < 0.001) transplanted patients. Neostigmine produced a dose-dependent decrease in heart rate in all patients. Controls were the most sensitive to neostigmine, with a 10% decrease in heart rate produced by an estimated dose of 5.0 ± 1.0 μg · kg-1. The recently transplanted group was the least sensitive, with the maximum dose producing only an 8.3 ± 0.9% reduction. The response to neostigmine of the remotely transplanted patients was variable. The estimated dose to produce a 10% decrease in heart rate in this group was 24 ± 6 μg · kg-1 which was greater than that for controls (P = 0.008). Administration of atropine (1.2 mg) reversed the neostigmine-induced bradycardia in all three groups. Reversal of the bradycardia consisted of a transient peak increase in heart rare in controls to 145 ± 6% of baseline, a value which was greater than that observed in recent (103 ± 1%, P < 0.001) and in remote (109 ± 3%, P < 0.001) transplants. Conclusions: Neostigmine produces a dose-dependent bradycardia in heart transplant patients. Some remotely transplanted patients may be particularly sensitive to the bradycardic effects of neostigmine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Backman, S. B., Fox, G. S., Stein, R. D., & Ralley, F. E. (1996). Neostigmine decreases heart rate in heart transplant patients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 43(4), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free