In American politics, legislative compromise is often seen as a necessary and desirable aspect of policymaking, yet people also value politicians who stick to their positions. In this article, we consider these conflicting expectations of legislators and ask two intertwined questions: what conditions lead people to punish legislators for not compromising (when legislative action is at stake) and, conversely, what conditions leave people more willing to overlook a legislator’s unwillingness to engage in compromise? Relying on previous research, we suggest that legislator gender, legislator partisanship, and issue area may all affect which legislators are punished for not compromising. Relying on two national experiments, we demonstrate that the extent to which lawmakers are punished for not compromising is conditional on the intersection of the three factors in this study. In general, our results suggest that people may be most willing to overlook unwillingness to engage in compromise when party, gender and issue ownership align than when party, gender, and issue ownership are at odds.
CITATION STYLE
Bauer, N. M., Yong, L. H., & Krupnikov, Y. (2017). Who is Punished? Conditions Affecting Voter Evaluations of Legislators Who Do Not Compromise. Political Behavior, 39(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9356-6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.