A framework for knowledge management in requirements engineering

2Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Managing knowledge properly has become a necessity in all types of professional activities, especially in those whose products are highly utilised and disseminated, such as software engineering. Because we live in a softwaredependent society, this technological development requires improving the processes of understanding and manufacturing; thus, it is recommended to use knowledge as a basis to achieve such improvements. This paper presents the results of an analysis of the proposals to manage knowledge in requirements engineering, in which it is evident that the proposals fail to meet the needs of work teams. The practices evaluated in this study propose an integrated framework for the management of knowledge in RE comprised by the conjunction between the phases of knowledge and the stages of RE and characterised by including two principles of complex thought: transdisciplinarity and multidimensionality.

References Powered by Scopus

Requirements engineering: A roadmap

1419Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information needs in collocated software development teams

395Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What makes APIs hard to learn? answers from developers

284Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Extended Rationale-Based Model for Tacit Knowledge Elicitation in Requirements Elicitation Context

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Formalizing Requirement Specifications for Problem Solving in a Research Domain

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edgar Serna, M., Alexei Serna, A., & Oscar Bachiller, S. (2018). A framework for knowledge management in requirements engineering. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 9(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2018.089694

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

36%

Computer Science 3

27%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

18%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0