Epidermal compromise in American cutaneous leishmaniasis

16Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL), Leishmania parasites enter the epidermis of the host via the bite of infected sandflies. Immune responses against the parasite vary from "effective" in localized (LCL) to a state of "selective anergy" in diffuse (DCL) cutaneous leishmaniasis, whereas the intermediate muco-cutaneous form (MCL) is characterized by an exacerbated cell-mediated immunity. We have shown that in LCL epidermis, Langerhans cells (LC) are increased, HLADR is universally expressed and intercellular adhesion molecule- 1 (ICAM- 1) immunoreactivity is distributed in patches. In addition, mRNA for IL-1β, IL-8, TNFα, TNFβ, and INFγ may be detected in epidermal sheets by reverse transcriptase followed by polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In contrast, DCL epidermis shows fewer LC than LCL epidermis, and expression of ICAM-1, HLA-DR, and IL-1β mRNA cannot be detected. MCL lesions show a mucosal epithelium lacking LC, but ICAM-1 is universally expressed. The clinical manifestations of ACL can be reproduced experimentally in different strains of inbred mice. In healthy mice, we have shown a positive correlation between LC and dendritic epidermal T cells (DETC) numbers. This correlation was not, however, observed in L. mexicana - infected mice, suggesting that infection alters the balance between the two cell types. In addition, agents that modulate LC and DETC cell densities change the development of experimental leishmaniasis. These results suggest that the epidermis is essential in determining the type of immune response that is developed against the Leishmania parasites. J Invest Dermatol 99: 95S-98S, 1992. © 1992.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cáceres-Dittmar, G., Sánchez, M. A., Oriol, O., Kraal, G., & Tapia, F. J. (1992). Epidermal compromise in American cutaneous leishmaniasis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 99(5), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12669972

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free