To screen or not to screen? Vitamin D deficiency in chronic mental illness

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the current study was to examine the pathology test utilisation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) within an Australian inpatient psychiatric setting. Method: A retrospective audit of 300 random hospital files of those admitted as inpatients between Nov 2014 and Nov 2015 was undertaken. Data was quantitatively analysed and described. Results: The number of inpatients who had a vitamin D determination during their admission was 37/300 (12.33%). The mean vitamin D level of those tested was 51.63 nmol/l. Of those that were tested, 18/37 (48.6%) were mildly to moderately deficient. There was a statistically significant difference in age and length of stay between those that were and were not tested for vitamin D levels, p-value <0.001 and 0.017, respectively. In addition, a simple linear regression indicated a weak association between length of stay and vitamin D levels. Conclusion: This audit highlights vitamin D screening inadequacy. More research is recommended to establish tangible benefits of supplementation, while local practice provides valuable data for education and policy purposes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goluza, I., Borchard, J., Wijesinghe, N., Wijesinghe, K., & Pai, N. (2018). To screen or not to screen? Vitamin D deficiency in chronic mental illness. Australasian Psychiatry, 26(1), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856217726717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free