Facial and prosodic affect recognition among pedophilic and nonpedophilic criminal child molesters

21Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present study compared facial and prosodic affect recognition abilities among pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters and community-dwelling controls. Pedophilic child molesters are characterized by primary sexual interest in prepubescent children, whereas nonpedophilic child molesters are characterized by offending against children despite being primarily sexually attracted to adults. The results showed that nonpedophilic child molesters made more errors in recognizing both facial and prosodic affect, performing more poorly than both controls and pedophilic child molesters. These findings are consistent with greater psychopathic tendencies among nonpedophilic molesters as well as with prior findings of smaller amygdala volume among child molesters. © 2009 Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suchy, Y., Whittaker, W. J., Strassberg, D. S., & Eastvold, A. (2009). Facial and prosodic affect recognition among pedophilic and nonpedophilic criminal child molesters. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 21(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208326930

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free