Interpreting Alzheimer's disease clinical trials in light of the effects on amyloid-β

23Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The failure of several potential Alzheimer's disease therapeutics in mid- to late-stage clinical development has provoked significant discussion regarding the validity of the amyloid hypothesis. In this review, we propose a minimum criterion of 25% for amyloid-β (Aβ) lowering to achieve clinically meaningful slowing of disease progression. This criterion is based on genetic, risk factor, clinical and preclinical studies. We then compare this minimum criterion with the degree of Aβ lowering produced by the potential therapies that have failed in clinical trials. If the proposed minimum Aβ lowering criterion is used, then the amyloid hypothesis has yet to be adequately tested in the clinic. Therefore, we believe that the amyloid hypothesis remains valid and remains to be confirmed or refuted in future clinical trials. © 2014 Toyn and Ahlijanian; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toyn, J. H., & Ahlijanian, M. K. (2014). Interpreting Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials in light of the effects on amyloid-β. Alzheimer’s Research and Therapy, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/alzrt244

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free