Assessing the Effects of Modern Renoprotective Agents in Preventing Progression of Renal Composite Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Type 2 diabetes is one of the leading causes of the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease, culminating in end-stage renal disease. Approximately two decades after successful implementation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone blocking system, three classes of agents [sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists] have shown significant potential to confer renoprotection. This network meta-analysis was undertaken to construct a hierarchy based on indirect pairwise comparisons and rankings among and within these three classes of molecules. Methods: A Cochrane library-based web search yielded 16 randomized controlled trials for analysis. Stata/BE 17.0 and RStudio 2022.07.1 Build 554 software were used to conduct a frequentist network meta-analysis. The effect size was assessed based on the odds ratio, and the MDS (multidimensional scaling) rank system was used to identify a hierarchy among reno-protective molecules. Results: Regarding the overall data, the SGLT-2i group of agents ranked higher than the other groups in preventing the progression of renal composite events in patients with T2D. Dapagliflozin ranked the highest among individual molecules. Conclusions: The SGLT-2i group of agents, especially dapagliflozin, is best suited to complement metabolic control in preventing the progression of renal composite outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghosal, S., & Sinha, B. (2023). Assessing the Effects of Modern Renoprotective Agents in Preventing Progression of Renal Composite Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-analysis. Diabetes Therapy, 14(2), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01359-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free