Thinking About Urban Materiality

  • Edensor T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The introductory chapter outlines the primary themes of the book and identifies the key theories of materiality that inform the work. In attempting to develop a comprehensive analysis of urban materiality, I argue that no single theoretical perspective will suffice, and that a range of diverse theories is integral to such a study, diverting from the singular theoretical approaches adopted in many academic studies of materiality. Accordingly, I consider a broad range of diverse theories that are particularly salient to this investigation, identifying their strengths and limitations. First, I consider Marxian notions of urban metabolism, the textual and representational focus on objects inspired by the cultural turn and the influential actor-network accounts that focus on the relationalities of materials. I subsequently explore assemblage theories before considering new materialist theories of urban vitalism. I then discuss phenomenology and post-phenomenology and further contextualise the account by identifying useful areas of geological thinking to emphasise that stone is entangled with the Anthropocene. I conclude by drawing on object-oriented ontologies to underline the limitations of all these theories and acknowledge the many unknowable, ineffable and inexplicable elements of materiality that we confront.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edensor, T. (2020). Thinking About Urban Materiality. In Stone (pp. 5–34). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4650-1_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free