Effects of bienzyme complex formation of cysteine synthetase from escherichia coli on some properties andkinetics

72Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Some properties and kinetics of the free and bound serine acetyltransferases (SATs) andO-acetylserine sulfhydrylase-As (OASS-As) from Escherichia coli were investigated. In some cases, SATΔC20, deleting 20 amino acid residues from the C-terminus of the wild-type SAT (Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 63, 168-179 (1999)) wastested for comparison. The optimum pH and stability against some reagents for the free and boundwild-type SATs were similar except for the resistance to cold inactivation. The kinetics for the wild-type SAT and SATΔC20 followed a Ping-Pong Bi Bi mechanism with a mixed-type inhibition by L-cysteine. The kinetics and kinetic constants for the wild-type SAT were not changed by the complex formation with OASS-A. The optimum pH for OASS-A was shifted towards an alkaline pH by the complex formation. Thermal stability and stability against some reagents for the free and bound OASS-As were almost the same. On the other hand, the maximum velocity for OASS-A was lowered and dissociation constants for the substrates and products were increased by forming the complex with the wild-type SAT, although the kinetics for the free and bound enzymes followed the same Ping-Pong Bi Bi mechanism. From comparisons of computed courses of L-cysteine formation from L-serine using SAT (wild-type SAT and SATΔC20) and OASS-A with the experimental results and changes in the stability of the wild-type SAT by the complex formation, we discuss the role and significance of a complex formation for the cysteine synthetase. © 2000, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mino, K., Yamanoue, T., Sakiyama, T., Eisaki, N., Matsuyama, A., & Nakanishi, K. (2000). Effects of bienzyme complex formation of cysteine synthetase from escherichia coli on some properties andkinetics. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 64(8), 1628–1640. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.64.1628

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free