Clinical Decision Support Stewardship: Best Practices and Techniques to Monitor and Improve Interruptive Alerts

23Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Interruptive clinical decision support systems, both within and outside of electronic health records, are a resource that should be used sparingly and monitored closely. Excessive use of interruptive alerting can quickly lead to alert fatigue and decreased effectiveness and ignoring of alerts. In this review, we discuss the evidence for effective alert stewardship as well as practices and methods we have found useful to assess interruptive alert burden, reduce excessive firings, optimize alert effectiveness, and establish quality governance at our institutions. We also discuss the importance of a holistic view of the alerting ecosystem beyond the electronic health record.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaparro, J. D., Beus, J. M., Dziorny, A. C., Hagedorn, P. A., Hernandez, S., Kandaswamy, S., … Orenstein, E. W. (2022, May 1). Clinical Decision Support Stewardship: Best Practices and Techniques to Monitor and Improve Interruptive Alerts. Applied Clinical Informatics. Georg Thieme Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748856

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free