Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Hemodialysis Patients with and Without Diabetes Mellitus

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims Glucose and insulin metabolism are altered in hemodialysis patients, and diabetes management is difficult in these patients. We aimed to validate flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in hemodialysis patients with and without diabetes mellitus as an attractive option for glucose monitoring not requiring regular self-punctures. Methods We measured interstitial glucose using a FreeStyle Libre device in eight hemodialysis patients with and seven without diabetes mellitus over 14 days and compared the results to simultaneously performed self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose (SMBG). Results In 720 paired measurements, mean flash glucose values were significantly lower than self-measured capillary values (6.17±2.52 vs. 7.15±2.41 mmol/L, p=1.3 E-86). Overall, the mean absolute relative difference was 17.4%, and the mean absolute difference was 1.20 mmol/L. The systematic error was significantly larger in patients without vs. with diabetes (- 1.17 vs. - 0.82 mmol/L) and on dialysis vs. interdialytic days (-1.09 vs. -0.90 mmol/L). Compared to venous blood glucose (72 paired measurements), the systematic error of FGM was even larger (5.89±2.44 mmol/L vs. 7.78±7.25 mmol/L, p=3.74E-22). Several strategies to reduce the systematic error were evaluated, including the addition of +1.0 mmol/L as a correction term to all FGM values, which significantly improved accuracy. Conclusions FGM systematically underestimates blood glucose in hemodialysis patients but, taking this systematic error into account, the system may be useful for glucose monitoring in hemodialysis patients with or without diabetes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weber, M. R., Diebold, M., Wiesli, P., & Kistler, A. D. (2023). Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Hemodialysis Patients with and Without Diabetes Mellitus. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology and Diabetes, 131(3), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1978-0226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free