The performance of classical versus modern finite-volume advection schemes for atmospheric modeling in a one-dimensional test-bed

17Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The methods discussed encompass leapfrog time stepping, with both discrete and spectral spatial resolution, various filters, and four Eulerian finite-volume advection schemes: the Prather scheme, the Bott scheme, the piecewise parabolic method (PPM), and four versions of the multidimensional positive-definite advection transport algorithm (MPDATA). The modern advection schemes, perform considerably better where computationally relatively inexpensive schemes (Bott, MPDATA) are recommended if a certain amount of numerical diffusion can be tolerated. The latter problem can almost completely be avoided if more sophisticated methods (Prather, PPM) are employed. This, however, increases the computational effort considerably. -from Author

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muller, R. (1992). The performance of classical versus modern finite-volume advection schemes for atmospheric modeling in a one-dimensional test-bed. Monthly Weather Review, 120(7), 1407–1415. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1407:tpocvm>2.0.co;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free