About I-beam versus H-beam connecting rod design using Inventor Autodesk 2018

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Design method based on 3D modelling and finite element analysis is very convenient since minimizes materials consumptions and reduces considerably the manufacturing costs. That is why it is widely used in cars sector - industry and research. Based on this method, a frequently encountered problem of car engines, namely connecting rod stress, is analysed in the paper. The approach refers to the motor-sport cars and consists in the comparative analysis of stress in two cases described by two profiles of the connecting rod shank - I-beam profile and H-beam profile. Connecting rod modelling as well as the finite element analysis were carried out with Autodesk Inventor 2018. The analysis indicated H-beam profile as optimum technical solution.

References Powered by Scopus

A repertoire of failures in connecting rods for internal combustion engines, and indications on traditional and advanced design methods

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of Piston, Connecting rod and Crank shaft assembly

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of Fatigue Stresses on Connecting Rod Subjected to Concentrated Loads At The Big End

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Design & analysis of connecting rod using ANSYS software

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stresses in the cap of a connecting rod

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Design and fatigue characteristics of connecting rod by using finite element analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frǎtiţa, M., Uzuneanu, K., & Balanescu, D. T. (2018). About I-beam versus H-beam connecting rod design using Inventor Autodesk 2018. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 444). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/444/7/072008

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

88%

Chemical Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free