Analysis of exam results of the subject ‘Applied mathematics for IT’

8Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper the exam results of the subject “Applied Mathematics for Informatics” (formerly Methods of Operation Research) from the last 13 years have been analysed. The exam has two parts: written test and oral exam. The grades of the students of the subject have been low for a long time. We would like to know if the low grades are due to the quality of the tests or due to a reducing number of hours of contact teaching. Another reason of low grades can be due to the mathematical character of the subject and to the unpopularity of such kind of subjects. Based on the bad results, students have also initiated a change in the scoring system. This article builds on our paper at the conference ERIE 2013. The main goals of this paper are to find out if the grades have had the tendency to decline during the years and to evaluate the validity, reliability, difficulty, and discrimination power of the tests.

References Powered by Scopus

The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice

11468Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on sijtsma

1142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures

1039Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Differences in results obtained by students of different faculties

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stakeholder perspectives on graphical tools for visualising student assessment and feedback data

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying the Difficulty of Academic Course Modules

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borožová, H., & Rydval, J. (2014). Analysis of exam results of the subject ‘Applied mathematics for IT.’ Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(3–4), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2014.070303

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

25%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

29%

Social Sciences 2

29%

Mathematics 2

29%

Decision Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free