Tabletop board game elements and gamification interventions for health behavior change: Realist review and proposal of a game design framework

31Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Games, when used as interventional tools, can influence behavior change by incentivizing, reinforcing, educating, providing feedback loops, prompting, persuading, or providing meaning, fun, and community. However, not all game elements will appeal to all consumers equally, and different elements might work for different people and in different contexts. Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a realist review of tabletop games targeting behavior change and to propose a framework for designing effective behavior change games. Methods: A realist review was conducted to inform program theory in the development of tabletop games for health behavior change. The context, mechanisms used to change behavior, and outcomes of included studies were reviewed through a realist lens. Results: Thirty-one papers met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Several design methods were identified that enhanced the efficacy of the games to change behavior. These included design by local teams, pilot testing, clearly defined targets of behavior change, conscious attention to all aspects of game design, including game mechanics, dynamics, aesthetics, and the elicitation of emotions. Delivery with other mediums, leveraging behavioral insights, prior training for delivery, and repeated play were also important. Some design elements that were found to reduce efficacy included limited replayability or lack of fun for immersive engagement. Conclusions: Game designers need to consider all aspects of the context and the mechanisms to achieve the desired behavior change outcomes. Careful design thinking should include consideration of the game mechanics, dynamics, aesthetics, emotions, and contexts of the game and the players. People who know the players and the contexts well should design the games or have significant input. Testing in real-world settings is likely to lead to better outcomes. Careful selection and purposeful design of the behavior change mechanisms at play is essential. Fun and enjoyment of the player should be considered, as without engagement, there will be no desired intervention effect.

References Powered by Scopus

Realist review - A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

2069Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games

2059Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses

877Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Application of Serious Games in Health Care: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Epstein, D. S., Zemski, A., Enticott, J., & Barton, C. (2021). Tabletop board game elements and gamification interventions for health behavior change: Realist review and proposal of a game design framework. JMIR Serious Games, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/23302

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

58%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

16%

Researcher 8

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 14

36%

Psychology 11

28%

Social Sciences 7

18%

Business, Management and Accounting 7

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0