Morel theories. Voluntarism and realism in medieval ethics

8Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In contrast to other articles in this series on the history of moral philosophy the present essay is not devoted to expounding the views of a single author, or to examining a particular moral theory. Instead it discusses an important dispute between two medical accounts of the relation between theological and moral propositions. In addition to its historical interest this debate is imporant both because it connects earlier and later ethical thought - being influenced by Greek moral theories and influencing subsequent European philosophy - and because it concerns issues that remain important to philosophers and to those who claim that their ethical beliefs are dictated by religious convictions.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Iustitia Dei: A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ethics and religion

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is every action morally significant?

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haldane, J. (1989). Morel theories. Voluntarism and realism in medieval ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 15(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.15.1.39

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘15‘20‘22‘23‘24‘2500.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 4

57%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

29%

Physics and Astronomy 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0