Opening Pandora’s Box? Joint Sovereignty and the Rise of EU Agencies with Operational Tasks

6Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article problematises the proliferation of European Union (EU) agencies with operational tasks as a new phenomenon capturing the exercise of joint sovereignty in European integration. While joint decision-making has been a feature of EU politics for decades, joint sovereignty is a broader category that additionally involves the creation of EU bodies able to intervene ‘on the ground’ alongside national public actors. We argue that the choice for joint sovereignty opens a Pandora’s box of implementation deficiencies which undermine the ability of both national and supranational actors to conduct operational activities effectively. We subsequently identify two frequent dysfunctions in policy implementation and connect them to ambiguity and conflict at the decision-making stage. Empirically, we illustrate the systemic link between decision-making and implementation problems in the functioning of two agencies with operational tasks active in the fields of border management (Frontex) and police cooperation (Europol).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freudlsperger, C., Maricut-Akbik, A., & Migliorati, M. (2022). Opening Pandora’s Box? Joint Sovereignty and the Rise of EU Agencies with Operational Tasks. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211066223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free