Physician recruitment of patients to non-therapeutic oncology clinical trials: Ethics revisited

10Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tailoring medical treatment to individual patients requires a strong foundation in research to provide the data necessary to understand the relationship between the disease, the patient, and the type of treatment advocated for. Non-therapeutic oncology clinical trials studying therapeutic resistance require the participation of patients, yet only a small percentage enroll. Treating physicians are often relied on to recruit patients, but they have a number of ethical obligations that might be perceived as barriers to recruiting. Concepts such as voluntariness of consent and conflicts of interest can have an impact on whether physicians will discuss clinical trials with their patients and how patients perceive the information. However, these ethical obligations should not be prohibitive to physician recruitment of patients - precautions can be taken to ensure that patients' consent to research participation is fully voluntary and devoid of conflict, such as the use of other members of the research team than the treating physician to discuss the trial and obtain consent, and better communication between researchers, clinicians, and patients. These can ensure that research benefits are maximized for the good of patients and society. © 2013 Black, Batist, Avard, Rousseau, Diaz and Knoppers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Black, L., Batist, G., Avard, D., Rousseau, C., Diaz, Z., & Knoppers, B. M. (2013). Physician recruitment of patients to non-therapeutic oncology clinical trials: Ethics revisited. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 4 MAR. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free