Initial reactions to the goldstone report and reflections on israeli accountability

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The legitimacy of Israel’s “Operation Cast Lead,” the 22-day military offensive in Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009, and of Israeli practices in its occupation of the Palestinian territories of Gaza and the West Bank was called into question by the Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict. The report, more commonly referred to as the Goldstone Report after Justice Richard Goldstone who headed the investigation, sparked an international controversy, the effects of which are still being felt at time of writing. This report was commissioned by the United Nations Human Rights Council on April 3, 2009 with the mandate “to investigate all violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that might have been committed at any time in the context of the military operations that were conducted in Gaza during the period from 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009, whether before, during or after”.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barnette, J. (2012). Initial reactions to the goldstone report and reflections on israeli accountability. In Is There a Court for Gaza?: A Test Bench for International Justice (pp. 123–143). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-820-0_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free