Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Experts in many countries are recommending a scaling up midwifery-led care as a model to improve maternal and newborn outcomes, reduce rates of unnecessary interventions, realise cost savings, and facilitate normal spontaneous vaginal birth. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare midwifery-led and obstetrician-gynaecologist-led care-related vaginal birth outcomes. Participants: Pregnant women in Kaunas city maternity care facilities. Methods: A propensity score-matched case-control study of midwifery-led versus physician-led low-risk birth outcomes. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between the groups. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical and binary variables are presented as frequency (percentage), and differences were analysed using the chi-square test. Analyses were conducted separately for the unmatched (before propensity score matched [PSM]) and matched (after PSM) groups. Results: After adjusting groups for propensity score, postpartum haemorrhage differences between physician-led and midwifery-led labours were significantly different (169.5 and 152.6 mL; p = 0.026), same for hospital stay duration (3.3 and 3.1 days, p = 0.042). Also, in matched population, significant differences were seen for episiotomy rates (chi2 = 4.8; p = 0.029), newborn Apgar 5 min score (9.58 and 9.76; p = 0.002), and pain relief (chi2 = 14.9; p = 0.002). Significant differences were seen in unmatched but not confirmed in matched population for obstetrical procedures used during labour, breastfeeding, birth induction, newborn Apgar 1 min scores, and successful vaginal birth as an overall spontaneous vaginal birth success measure. Conclusion: The midwifery-led care model showed significant differences from the physician-led care model in episiotomy rates, hospital stay duration and postpartum haemorrhage, and newborn Apgar 5 min scores. Midwifery-led care is as safe as physician-led care and does not influence the rate of successful spontaneous vaginal births.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poškienė, I., Vanagas, G., Kirkilytė, A., & Nadišauskienė, R. J. (2021). Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis. Open Medicine (Poland), 16(1), 1537–1543. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0373

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free