Children’s Interpretation of Ambiguous wh-Adjuncts in Mandarin Chinese

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper reports two studies investigating children’s acquisition of the wh-adjunct zenme in Mandarin. Unlike other Mandarin wh-words that correspond to a single meaning, zenme can be used to question either the manner or the cause of an event. Study 1 explored whether children understand that zenme is ambiguous between a causal and a manner reading. Study 2 examined whether they can use syntactic cues to disambiguate the two readings. The findings show that children as young as 4 years of age access both the manner and the causal reading, but they prefer the former over the latter. Children exhibit a developmental trajectory when acquiring the mapping relations between the syntactic positions of zenme and its corresponding semantic interpretations: 5-year-olds can use syntactic cues to disambiguate the two readings; 3-year-olds, however, are still in the stage of working out how the syntactic positions are mapped onto the relevant semantic interpretations; the critical change occurs at around 4 years of age. The implications of the findings were then discussed in relation to the two major competing theories of child language acquisition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, J., & Zhou, P. (2020). Children’s Interpretation of Ambiguous wh-Adjuncts in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01781

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free