A local basal area adjustment for crown width prediction

76Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Nonlinear crown width regression equations were developed for 24 species common to the upper Lake States of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Of the species surveyed, 15 produced statistically significant (P < 0.05) local basal area effect coefficients showing a reduction in crown width with increasing stand density. No relation bet\veen shade tolerance and crown width was apparent, indicating the speciesdependence of this parameter. Using adjusted R2 as a guide, nonlinear crown width models adapted for local basal area (NLCWadj) improved prediction for 20 of24 species over a model lacking this component (NLCW). The ecolosical significance of the improvement shown for some species mav be minor, but for others the difference was substantial (often 8%).

References Powered by Scopus

Patterns of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forests of eastern North America.

736Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: Interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees

611Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forest models defined by field measurements: I. The design of a northeastern forest simulator

342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Forest Growth and Yield Modeling

626Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updated generalized biomass equations for North American tree species

235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predictable changes in aboveground allometry of trees along gradients of temperature, aridity and competition

209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bragg, D. C. (2001). A local basal area adjustment for crown width prediction. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 18(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/18.1.22

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

44%

Researcher 9

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

48%

Environmental Science 9

43%

Chemical Engineering 1

5%

Energy 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0