Autologous bone marrow transplantation using unfractionated cells cryopreserved in dimethylsulfoxide and hydroxyethyl starch without controlled-rate freezing

160Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To develop a simplified method of bone marrow (BM) cryopreservation, changes were made in the standard method in three areas: the cryoprotectant, the method of cell freezing, and the storage temperature. Unfractionated BM cells from 60 patients were cryopreserved in 300-mL aliquots in both dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES), a combination known to preserve granulocyte successfully. The cells were frozen without rate-controlled freezing by simple immersion into a -80°C freezer where they remained until the time of reinfusion. The 60 patients underwent 72 autologous transplants after three high-dose chemotherapy regimens: 30 received high-dose carmustine in combination, five received high-dose busulfan and cyclophosphamide, and 37 received high-dose aziridimylbenzoquinone. The BM was infused for more than 30 minutes after rapid thawing at 37°C. The mean post-thaw nucleated cell recovery was 96% ± 11.6%, and Trypan blue dye exclusion was 82.2% ± 9.2%. The mean postthaw CFU-GM and BFU-E recoveries were 81.9% ± 39.0% and 90.5% ± 41.2%. Complete count recovery occurred in 68 of 72 transplants. Median times to a WBC count > 1,000/μL, a granulocyte count > 1,000/μL and a platelet count > 20,000/μL were 15, 21, and 15 days, respectively. Risk factors for delayed recovery were not found. Unfractionated BM cells can be successfully cryopreserved in the DMSO/HES mixture rapidly and inexpensively, without rate-controlled freezing or storage at liquid nitrogen temperatures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stiff, P. J., Koester, A. R., Weidner, M. K., Dvorak, K., & Fisher, R. I. (1987). Autologous bone marrow transplantation using unfractionated cells cryopreserved in dimethylsulfoxide and hydroxyethyl starch without controlled-rate freezing. Blood, 70(4), 974–978. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v70.4.974.bloodjournal704974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free