Two attempts to formalize counterpossible reasoning in deterministic settings

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper motivates the study of counterpossibles (logically impossible counterfactuals) as necessary for developing a decision theory suitable for generally intelligent agents embedded within their environments. We discuss two attempts to formalize a decision theory using counterpossibles, one based on graphical models and another based on proof search.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soares, N., & Fallenstein, B. (2015). Two attempts to formalize counterpossible reasoning in deterministic settings. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9205, pp. 156–165). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21365-1_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free