Do polymorphic variants of chromosomes affect the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment?

55Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chromosomal polymorphic variations on the outcome of IVF and embryo transfer (IVFembryo transfer) treatment for infertile couples.Methods During the period from October 2006 to December 2009, 1978 infertile couples who had received their first IVFembryo transfer treatment cycle in our hospital were selected for this retrospective study, and the frequency of chromosomal polymorphic variations was calculated. From these, 1671 couples were selected and divided into three groups: 1402 couples with normal chromosomes (Group 1/control group), 82 couples with chromosomal polymorphic variations in only females (Group 2) and 187 couples with chromosomal polymorphic variations in only males (Group 3). The clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), early miscarriage rates and ongoing pregnancy rates after IVFembryo transfer treatment were compared.Results There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in implantation rates (29.37 in the control group, 29.70 in Group 2 and 31.41 in Group 3, P > 0.05) and CPR (45.86, 46.34 and 51.87, respectively, P > 0.05). Although there was a trend toward higher first trimester pregnancy loss rates in Group 3 (male chromosomal polymorphic variations), but not in Group 2, compared with normal karyotype couples (10.31 versus 6.84), the difference did not reach significance (P > 0.05). Conclusions Chromosomal polymorphic variations appear to have no adverse effects on the outcome of IVFembryo transfer treatment. © 2011 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hong, Y., Zhou, Y. W., Tao, J., Wang, S. X., & Zhao, X. M. (2011). Do polymorphic variants of chromosomes affect the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment? Human Reproduction, 26(4), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq333

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free