Emerging understanding and measurement of plasma volume expansion in pregnancy

62Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Plasma volume expansion is an important component of a successful pregnancy. The failure of maternal plasma volume expansion has been implicated in adverse obstetric outcomes such as pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth. Altered iron homeostasis and elevated maternal hemoglobin concentrations have also been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes; limited data have suggested that these effects may be mediated by inadequate plasma volume expansion. In addition, it has been noted that pregnant, obese women, compared with lean subjects, have decreased plasma volume expansion along with impaired iron homeostasis and increased inflammation. Current estimates of plasma volume expansion are outdated and do not necessarily reflect contemporary obstetric populations. Moreover, the validation of clinically applicable methods of plasma volume determination as well as enhanced methodologies should be a priority. Further study is needed to characterize diminished plasma volume expansion during pregnancy and to understand the potential role of impaired iron homeostasis and inflammation in adverse obstetric outcomes, especially in obese women.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

908Citations
437Readers
Get full text
868Citations
798Readers
Get full text
820Citations
1338Readers

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

148Citations
378Readers

This article is free to access.

134Citations
425Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vricella, L. K. (2017). Emerging understanding and measurement of plasma volume expansion in pregnancy. In American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Vol. 106, pp. 1620S-1625S). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.117.155903

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 50

69%

Researcher 14

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 41

57%

Nursing and Health Professions 17

24%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0