Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of junior cyclists of different specialties and performance levels

33Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study analyzes the anthropometric and physiological characteristics of junior cyclists within different cycling specialties and different performance levels. One hundred and thirty-two junior riders (16.8 ± 0.6 years, 177 ± 6cm, 66.3 ± 6.7kg) were tested for anthropometric, aerobic and anaerobic parameters. Cyclists were classified within specialties [uphill (UH) flat terrain (FT) all terrain (AT) and sprint (SP)] and performance levels, based on a seasonal ranking [low level (LL) medium level (ML) and high level (HL)]. The results of the two-way analysis of variance showed that FT and SP have greater body dimensions than UH and AT (P<0.001). Concerning the relative aerobic parameters, AT and UH have higher values (P<0.001) than FT and SP [maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max): 69.4 ± 3.6, 67.5 ± 5.0, 62.8 ± 4.5 and 61.9 ± 4.1mL/kg/min, respectively] while absolute parameters resulted higher for FT and AT (P≤0.008). The relative power produced in the 5s test was higher (P<0.001) for AT and SP than FT and UH (16.7 ± 1.1, 16.6 ± 0.6, 14.9 ± 1.7 and 14.4 ± 1.7W/kg, respectively). Concerning the performance level, only the age and the aerobic parameters resulted differently within levels (VO2max: HL=67.3 ± 4.9, ML=65.5 ± 5.1 and LL=63.3 ± 5.2mL/kg/min), with the highest values for HL (P≤0.007). In conclusion, juniors are specialized in the same way as professional cyclists and the aerobic characteristics are confirmed as significant in the performance level assessment. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menaspà, P., Rampinini, E., Bosio, A., Carlomagno, D., Riggio, M., & Sassi, A. (2012). Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of junior cyclists of different specialties and performance levels. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 22(3), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01168.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free