The SPARC water vapor assessment II: Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based microwave measurements

14Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As part of the second SPARC (Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate) water vapor assessment (WAVAS-II), we present measurements taken from or coincident with seven sites from which ground-based microwave instruments measure water vapor in the middle atmosphere. Six of the ground-based instruments are part of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) and provide datasets that can be used for drift and trend assessment. We compare measurements from these ground-based instruments with satellite datasets that have provided retrievals of water vapor in the lower mesosphere over extended periods since 1996. We first compare biases between the satellite and ground-based instruments from the upper stratosphere to the upper mesosphere. We then show a number of time series comparisons at 0.46 hPa, a level that is sensitive to changes in H2O and CH4 entering the stratosphere but, because almost all CH4 has been oxidized, is relatively insensitive to dynamical variations. Interannual variations and drifts are investigated with respect to both the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS; from 2004 onwards) and each instrument's climatological mean. We find that the variation in the interannual difference in the mean H2O measured by any two instruments is typically ∼ 1%. Most of the datasets start in or after 2004 and show annual increases in H2O of 0-1 % yr-1. In particular, MLS shows a trend of between 0.5 % yr-1 and 0.7 % yr-1 at the comparison sites. However, the two longest measurement datasets used here, with measurements back to 1996, show much smaller trends of +0.1 % yr-1 (at Mauna Loa, Hawaii) and -0.1 % yr-1 (at Lauder, New Zealand).

Figures

  • Figure 1. The color and symbol scheme used for instruments and their retrieval versions used in comparisons throughout this study.
  • Figure 2. Left: a typical set of averaging kernels for GBMW retrievals (in this case for retrievals from Mauna Loa). The thin lines are referenced to the lower x axis and represent the sensitivity of the measurement to perturbations at individual pressure levels. Certain levels are indicated by colored lines. For these lines the level of the perturbation is indicated by the short colored lines on the right. Generally this colored line is near the peak of the respective kernel, but at the higher altitudes where the sensitivity begins to drop < 1 an offset develops. The single thick black line is referenced to the upper x axis and indicates the sum of the averaging kernels at that level. Ideally the sum of these kernels is near unity, as indicated by the dashed line. Right: the gray line shows the water vapor profile obtained for this particular retrieval from Mauna Loa.
  • Figure 3. The average difference between coincident non-MIPAS satellite measurements and ground-based measurements at seven sites shown from south to north. Results are shown from 3 to 0.3 hPa. The difference shown is convolved satellite minus GBMW using the satellite symbols given in Fig. 1. The numbers on the left of each panel indicate the number of coincidences.
  • Figure 4. Same as Fig. 3, only for comparisons between various MIPAS retrievals and ground-based measurements.
  • Figure 5. Annual average differences between coincident H2O measurements at 0.46 hPa. Results are shown at six ground-based sites and all differences are with respect to MLS measurements at those sites. Annual average differences are shown four times per year (see text). The symbols used are from Fig. 1 and indicate the instrument that is being compared with MLS.
  • Figure 6. The drift (y axis) and mean absolute interannual difference (x axis) between coincident H2O measurements at 0.46 hPa. Results are shown at six ground-based sites and, unless otherwise indicated, all differences are with respect to MLS measurements at those sites. The large symbols indicate differences for coincident comparisons, as were shown in Fig. 2. The small symbols indicate comparisons of annual average differences from climatologies (see text for details). The symbols used are from Fig. 1 and indicate the instrument that is being compared with MLS. The MLS symbol shows the results of comparisons between convolved and unconvolved MLS measurements. The overlap period between HALOE and MLS is too short for these analyses, but we do perform these analyses for GBMW vs. HALOE comparisons at Lauder and Mauna Loa. These are indicated using the HALOE symbols from Fig. 1.
  • Figure 7. Measurements since 1996 at 0.46 hPa from or coincident with six NDACC sites. The results shown are the annual anomaly plus the constant term from the five-parameter fit (see text). Values are shown four times per year. Symbols and colors are from Fig. 1.
  • Figure 8. Linear trends at 0.46 hPa at each of the six NDACC ground-based sites. Trends are calculated over the data collection period for each instrument shown in Fig. 6. The sites are listed from south to north: Lauder (45◦ S), Mauna Loa (20◦ N), Table Mountain (34◦ N), Seoul (37◦ N), Bern (47◦ N), and Onsala (57◦ N). Symbols are slightly offset from each other along the x axis for legibility. Larger symbols indicate longer datasets.

References Powered by Scopus

Observations: Atmosphere and surface

1692Citations
2395Readers
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nedoluha, G. E., Kiefer, M., Lossow, S., Michael Gomez, R., Kämpfer, N., Lainer, M., … Walker, K. A. (2017). The SPARC water vapor assessment II: Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based microwave measurements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(23), 14543–14558. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14543-2017

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

56%

Researcher 6

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

29%

Physics and Astronomy 5

29%

Environmental Science 4

24%

Chemistry 3

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0