Quantifier scope disambiguation using extracted pragmatic knowledge: Preliminary results

16Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is well known that pragmatic knowledge is useful and necessary in many difficult language processing tasks, but because this knowledge is difficult to acquire and process automatically, it is rarely used. We present an open information extraction technique for automatically extracting a particular kind of pragmatic knowledge from text, and we show how to integrate the knowledge into a Markov Logic Network model for quantifier scope disambiguation. Our model improves quantifier scope judgments in experiments. © 2009 ACL and AFNLP.

References Powered by Scopus

Markov logic networks

2165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalized quantifiers and natural language

1454Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction

428Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An experimental investigation of the scope of object comparative quantifier phrases

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A notion of semantic coherence for underspecified semantic representation

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lexicon and Logic: A Corpus-Based Investigation Into a Connection Between Prepositional Senses and Quantifier Scope

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Srinivasan, P., & Yates, A. (2009). Quantifier scope disambiguation using extracted pragmatic knowledge: Preliminary results. In EMNLP 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: A Meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of ACL, Held in Conjunction with ACL-IJCNLP 2009 (pp. 1465–1474).

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

65%

Researcher 11

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 43

77%

Linguistics 9

16%

Social Sciences 3

5%

Neuroscience 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free