Clinical evaluation of the additive effect of diquafosol tetrasodium on sodium hyaluronate monotherapy in patients with dry eye syndrome: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study

63Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

PurposeTo assess the additive effect of diquafosol tetrasodium on sodium hyaluronate monotherapy in patients with dry eye syndrome.MethodsThis study evaluated 64 eyes of 32 patients (age: 62.6±12.8 years (mean±SD)) in whom treatment with 0.1% sodium hyaluronate was insufficiently responsive. The eyes were randomly assigned to one of the two regimens in each patient: topical administration of sodium hyaluronate and diquafosol tetrasodium in one eye, and that of sodium hyaluronate in the other. Before treatment, and 2 and 4 weeks after treatment, we determined tear volume, tear film break-up time (BUT), fluorescein and rose bengal vital staining scores, subjective symptoms, and adverse events.ResultsWe found a significant improvement in BUT (P0.049, Dunnett test), fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores (P0.02), and in subjective symptoms (P0.004 for dry eye sensation, P0.02 for pain, and P0.02 for foreign body sensation) 4 weeks after treatment in the diquafosol eyes. On the other hand, we found no significant change in these parameters after treatment in the control eyes.ConclusionsIn dry eyes, where sodium hyaluronate monotherapy was insufficient, diquafosol tetrasodium was effective in improving objective and subjective symptoms, suggesting its viability as an option for the additive treatment of such eyes. © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kamiya, K., Nakanishi, M., Ishii, R., Kobashi, H., Igarashi, A., Sato, N., & Shimizu, K. (2012). Clinical evaluation of the additive effect of diquafosol tetrasodium on sodium hyaluronate monotherapy in patients with dry eye syndrome: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Eye (Basingstoke), 26(10), 1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.166

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free