Correlation between NT-proBNP levels and the maximun vasoactive-inotropic score in the first 24 hours post-intervention of cardiac surgery

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical utility of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a prognostic marker in pediatric patients with heart failure is controversial. The maximum vasoactive inotropic score at 24 h after cardiac surgery in pediatric patients is an important predictor of morbidity and postoperative mortality. Objective: To determine if there is a correlation between the serum levels of NT-proBNP and the maximum vasoactive inotropic score at 24 hours after cardiac surgery in pediatric patients seen in the Intensive Care Unit. Material and methods: An analytical cross-sectional study. A Spearman correlation analysis (rs) was performed between the serum level of NT-proBNP and the maximum inotropic score both taken at 24 hours posto-peratively. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 40 patients were included, 52.5% to the male sex, 72.5% were older than 1 year of age at the time of surgery. A low correlation (rs = 0.26) was found between the serum levels of NT-proBNP and the maximum vasoactive inotropic score at 24 hours, this correlation was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Conclusions: To our understanding, the present study is the first to investigate whether there is a correlation between these markers, so our results could set an important precedent that marks the beginning of multiple investigations in our critically ill patients in order to establish new diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ibarra-Sarlat, M., Fuentes-Lara, E. I., Sánchez-Bañuelos, C., & Núñez-Enríquez, J. C. (2019). Correlation between NT-proBNP levels and the maximun vasoactive-inotropic score in the first 24 hours post-intervention of cardiac surgery. Archivos de Cardiologia de Mexico, 89(4), 376–381. https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.19000017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free