Groningen Frailty Indicator–Chinese (GFI-C) for pre-frailty and frailty assessment among older people living in communities: psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The early identification of pre-frailty and frailty among older people is a global priority because of the increasing incidence of frailty and associated adverse health outcomes. This study aimed to validate the Groningen Frailty Indicator-Chinese (GFI-C), a widely used screening instrument, and determine the optimal cut-off value in Chinese communities to facilitate pre-frailty and frailty screening. Methods: This methodological study employed a cross-sectional and correlational design to examine the psychometric properties of GFI-C, namely, internal consistency, stability, and concurrent and construct validities. The appropriate cut-off values for pre-frailty and frailty screening in the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve were determined through sensitivity and specificity analysis. Results: A total of 350 community older people had been assessed and interviewed by a nurse. The GFI-C showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.87) and two-week test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.87). Concurrent validity (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) showed a moderate correlation with Fried’s frailty phenotype. The known-groups method, hypothesis testing and confirmatory factory analysis (three-factor model; χ2/df = 2.87, TLI = 0.92, CFI = 0.93, GFI = 0.92, RMR = 0.014; RMSEA = 0.073) were suitable for the establishment of construct validity. Based on the ROC and Youden’s index, the optimal cut-off GFI-C values were 2 (sensitivity, 71.5%; specificity, 84.7%) for pre-frailty and 3 for frailty (sensitivity, 88.2%; specificity, 79.6%). Conclusions: The result indicated that GFI-C is a reliable and valid instrument for pre-frailty and frailty screening among older Chinese people in communities. For optimal diagnostic accuracy, the cut-off values of 3 for frailty and 2 for pre-frailty are recommended.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, E. Y. Z., Cheung, J., Liu, J. Y. W., Kwan, R. Y. C., & Lam, S. C. (2022). Groningen Frailty Indicator–Chinese (GFI-C) for pre-frailty and frailty assessment among older people living in communities: psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03437-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free