How effective is patient-controlled analgesia? A randomized comparison of two protocols for pain relief during oocyte recovery

17Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although the conventional method of pain relief during outpatient oocyte recovery involves physician-administered drugs, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) offers an alternative technique with the potential to give women more control over peroperative analgesia. We conducted a prospective randomized study to compare the effect of fentanyl administered either through a PCA delivery system or by a physician. Thirty-nine women were randomized to PCA during egg collection while 42 were allocated to receive intermittent doses administered by a physician. Pain was evaluated by means of a 100 mm linear analogue scale. The mean (SD) pain score in the PCA group was 38.5 (19.8) while in the other group it was 46.1 (21.3) (P = 0.1). In the PCA group, 64% of women felt very satisfied with their analgesia as compared with 57% in the non-PCA group (P = 0.6). Among the PCA users, 39% of demands were successful. Significantly more fentanyl (97.5 μg) was used in the PCA group than in the other group (84.6 μg) (P = 0.03). Though intraoperative PCA with fentanyl is an effective alternative to physician-administered techniques, many women still feel the need for more analgesia during the procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhattacharya, S., MacLennan, F., Hamilton, M. P. R., & Templeton, A. (1997). How effective is patient-controlled analgesia? A randomized comparison of two protocols for pain relief during oocyte recovery. Human Reproduction, 12(7), 1440–1442. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.7.1440

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free