This article discusses differences and continuity in responses to issues of slave management in two texts from different periods of Greek history (Xenophon's Oeconomicus and the Odyssey) and compares these responses to those of slave owners in the Antebellum South, ancient Rome, and the ancient Near East. In particular, it examines different expressions of paternalistic attitudes towards slaves (a well-studied feature of slave-owning classes throughout history) that it finds are present in both of these examples. The article explores the possibility that intertextual links were responsible for these similarities but suggests instead that they are reflective of real Greek slaveholding ideology across hundreds of years, which primarily served to justify an exploitative system and disguise the cruelty and violence inherent in maintaining it.
CITATION STYLE
Porter, J. D. (2021). THE ARCHAIC ROOTS of PATERNALISM: CONTINUITY in ATTITUDES towards SLAVES and SLAVERY in the ODYSSEY, XENOPHON’S OECONOMICUS, and beyond. Greece and Rome, 68(2), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383521000061
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.