Meperidine for patients expected to have poor tolerance to esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Anxious patients and those with poor tolerance to previous esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) usually have poor tolerance for EGD. Aims: To investigate the effect of meperidine on these patients during EGD. Methods: A total of 110 patients undergoing diagnostic EGD were randomized to receive either meperidine (n = 55) or placebo (n = 55) before EGD. The primary outcome was patient discomfort scores during esophageal intubation. Results: Patients in the meperidine group reported less discomfort during esophageal intubation (median score of 5.0 and interquartile range (IQR) 1.5–7.0) compared with the control (median score of 6.0, IQR 5.0–8.5, P =.003). Patients in the meperidine group had better tolerance during the procedure (median score of 2 (IQR 1.0–3.0) versus 3 (IQR 1.0–4.0), P =.048), and the endoscopists reported higher overall satisfaction scores (median score of 9 (IQR 7.0–9.0) versus 8 (IQR 7.0–9.0), P =.043). There was significantly less increase in heart rate and blood pressure during the procedure in the meperidine group than in the placebo group (23 bpm (IQR 9–32) versus 30 bpm (IQR 18–52); P =.006); (7 mmHg (IQR 1–14) versus 18 mmHg (IQR 2–30); P =.008). Connect-the-numbers test showed comparable results before and after EGD between the two groups. Conclusion: For patients expected to have poor tolerance during EGD, meperidine reduced discomfort, decreased cardiovascular distress, and improved endoscopist satisfaction, without adverse effects on their psychomotor function after the procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tseng, C. W., Koo, M., Tseng, K. C., & Hsieh, Y. H. (2018). Meperidine for patients expected to have poor tolerance to esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 6(9), 1307–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618797821

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free