Can Chest Ultrasound Replace Chest X-ray in Thoracic Surgery?

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence that supports the use of chest ultrasound (CUS) versus conventional chest X-ray (CXR) in order to diagnose postoperative complications. However, data regarding its use after thoracic surgery are scarce and contradictory. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of CUS after thoracic surgery. Methods: An electronic search in MEDLINE (via PubMed), complemented by manual searches in article references, was conducted to identify eligible studies. Results: Six studies with a total of 789 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Performing CXR decreased in up to 61.6% of cases, with the main reasons for performing CXR being massive subcutaneous emphysema or complex hydrothorax. Agreement between CUS and routine-based therapeutic options was, in some studies, up to 97%. Conclusions: The selectively postoperative use of CUS may reduce the number of routinely performed CXR. However, if CUS findings are inconclusive, further radiological examinations are obligatory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grapatsas, K., Leivaditis, V., Ehle, B., & Papaporfyriou, A. (2022, August 1). Can Chest Ultrasound Replace Chest X-ray in Thoracic Surgery? Tomography. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040175

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free