Mechanical circulatory support in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for cardiogenic shock

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the development of acute revascularisation, the mortality rate for cardiogenic shock remains around 50%. Mechanical circulatory support devices have long held promise in improving outcomes in shock, but high-quality evidence of benefit has not been forthcoming. In this article we review the currently available devices for treating shock, their physiological effects and the evidence base for their use in practice. We subsequently look ahead within this developing field, including new devices and novel indications for established technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ryan, M., Briceno, N., & Perera, D. (2019). Mechanical circulatory support in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for cardiogenic shock. Korean Circulation Journal. Korean Society of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2018.0443

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free