Radical Hope, Despair and Time: Responses to Nietzsche

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Taking its cue from the critique of hope elaborated by Jonathan Lear’s book entitled Radical Hope, this paper explores the stakes of such a critique in the work of four thinkers in the so-called continental or European philosophical tradition: Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Emmanuel Levinas, and Jacques Derrida. The critique of hope informed by these thinkers revolves around the various ways in which radical hope seems to converge with its opposite, namely despair. The essay identifies three levels in which the “absurdity” of hope plays out in Nietzsche’s thought, before examining its legacy in Heidegger, Levinas, and Derrida. It concludes that the stakes of a critique of hope have less to do with justifying or legitimating hope as virtue, theological or otherwise, than they have to do with identifying the ways in which hope inevitably overflows the ethical and moral categories in which we often try to capture it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coyne, R. (2022). Radical Hope, Despair and Time: Responses to Nietzsche. In Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life (Vol. 10, pp. 109–123). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95062-0_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free