Doing Health Policy Analysis: The Enduring Relevance of Simple Models Comment on “Modelling the Health Policy Process: One Size Fits All or Horses for Courses”

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The analysis of health policy processes in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) emerged ‎as a research area in the early 1990s. In their recent editorial Powell and Mannion argue that ‎such research can be deepened by applying public policy theory. In response, we raise three ‎questions to consider: are public policy models fit for purpose in today’s world in LMICs (and ‎what other theory can be used)? Is using theory the most important factor in deepening such ‎research? Why do we, as researchers, do this work? Ultimately, we argue that the value of ‎simple models, such as those already used in health policy analysis, lies in their enduring ‎relevance and widespread use. They are supporting the development of the shared ‎understandings that can, in turn, provide the basis for collective action addressing inequities in ‎health and well-being.‎.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilson, L., & Walt, G. (2023). Doing Health Policy Analysis: The Enduring Relevance of Simple Models Comment on “Modelling the Health Policy Process: One Size Fits All or Horses for Courses.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management. Kerman University of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free