Comparison of ankle-brachial index (ABI) measured by an automated oscillometric apparatus with that by standard hand-held doppler in patients with Type-2 diabetes

8Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the difference between an automated oscillometric ABI measurement as compared to standard hand-held doppler ABI in patients with Type-2 diabetes. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at foot clinic of Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology (BIDE), Baqai Medical University (BMU), a tertiary care unit, Karachi-Pakistan. The duration of study was February 2018 to March 2018. Patients with Type-2 diabetes attending the outpatient department (OPD) of foot clinic, irrespective of their symptoms were included. Baseline demographic, anthropometric measurements and biochemical parameters were recorded. The ABI was calculated with both devices by an automated oscillometric machine and standard hand-held doppler with the same investigator. Results: Total of 93 patients with Type-2 diabetes, 18 (19.4%) females and 75(80.6%) males were recruited. Mean age was 54.67±9.59 years and mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 131.38±20.2/80.36±10.23mmHg. Most of the patients had poor glycemic control at presentation with a mean HbA1c of 9.56±2.44%. Mean standard handheld doppler ABI and automated oscillometric ABI was 1.28±1.08 and 1.07±0.23 for right foot (mean difference = 0.21; P= 0.075), and 1.14±0.45 and 1.1±0.25 for left foot (mean difference =0.04; P=0.434), respectively. Similarly, sensitivity and specificity between two modalities was observed 60% and 93.90% for right foot, meanwhile, 60% and 97.40% for left foot, respectively. Conclusion: An automated oscillometric method is comparable with standard handheld-doppler method. It is cost effective, convenient and less time consuming, can be widely used to measure ABI without special training.

References Powered by Scopus

Measurement and interpretation of the Ankle-Brachial Index: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association

1292Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use and utility of Ankle brachial index in patients with diabetes

211Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automated ankle-brachial pressure index measurement by clinical staff for peripheral arterial disease diagnosis in nondiabetic and diabetic patients

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Automated measurements of ankle-brachial index: A narrative review

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Safety and efficacy of electrical stimulation for lower-extremity muscle weakness in intensive care unit 2019 Novel Coronavirus patients: A phase I double-blinded randomized controlled trial

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electrical stimulation to regain lower extremity muscle perfusion and endurance in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS CoV-2: A randomized controlled trial

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khan, S. Z., Zafar, A. B., Waris, N., Miyan, Z., Ulhaque, M. S., & Fawwad, A. (2019). Comparison of ankle-brachial index (ABI) measured by an automated oscillometric apparatus with that by standard hand-held doppler in patients with Type-2 diabetes. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 35(4), 1167–1172. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.4.30

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

82%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

27%

Sports and Recreations 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free