The effect of obesity on spirometry tests among healthy non-smoking adults

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The effects of obesity on pulmonary functions have not been addressed previously among Saudi population. We aim to study the effects of obesity on spirometry tests among healthy non-smoking adults.Methods: A cross sectional study conducted among volunteers healthy non-smoking adults Subjects. We divided the subjects into two groups according to their BMI. The first group consisted of non-obese subjects with BMI of 18 to 24.9 kg/m2 and the second group consisted of obese subjects with BMI of 30 kg/m2 and above. Subjects underwent spirometry tests according to American thoracic society standards with measurement of the following values: the forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) and forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75).Results: The total subjects were 294 with a mean age of 32 years. There were 178 males and 116 females subjects. We found no significant differences in FEV1 (p value = 0.686), FVC (p value = 0.733), FEV1/FVC Ratio (p value = 0.197) and FEF25-75 (p value = 0.693) between the obese and non-obese subjects. However, there was significantly difference in PEF between the two groups (p value < 0.020).Conclusion: Obesity does not have effect on the spirometry tests (except PEF) among health non-smoking adults. We recommend searching for alternative diagnosis in case of findings abnormal spirometry tests results among obese subjects. © 2012 Al Ghobain; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Author supplied keywords

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al Ghobain, M. (2012). The effect of obesity on spirometry tests among healthy non-smoking adults. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-10

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

64%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

13%

Researcher 6

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 35

65%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

11%

Social Sciences 5

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free