RESEARCHERS IN THE PANOPTICON? GEOGRAPHIES OF RESEARCH, FIELDWORK, AND AUTHORITARIANISM

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Building on an emerging scholarly literature that discusses methodological issues related to the safety of researchers, I explore the lived experiences of Western researchers who conducted fieldwork in authoritarian settings. Through an analysis of power as a relational phenomenon, the article examines the ways in which researchers are subject to diffuse topologies of power that can be deployed in various contexts and at various scales. Evidence suggests that as researchers immerse themselves into fieldwork, their everyday encounters with the authorities make them become progressively aware of their surroundings and of the fact that they might be being observed. Researchers thus discipline themselves and normalize a number of self-policing behaviours and practices that can significantly influence processes of knowledge production. Keywords: authoritarianism, disciplinary power, fieldwork, panopticon, methodology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menga, F. (2020). RESEARCHERS IN THE PANOPTICON? GEOGRAPHIES OF RESEARCH, FIELDWORK, AND AUTHORITARIANISM. Geographical Review, 110(3), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2019.1684197

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free