Termination analysis by learning terminating programs

52Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present a novel approach to termination analysis. In a first step, the analysis uses a program as a black-box which exhibits only a finite set of sample traces. Each sample trace is infinite but can be represented by a finite lasso. The analysis can "learn" a program from a termination proof for the lasso, a program that is terminating by construction. In a second step, the analysis checks that the set of sample traces is representative in a sense that we can make formal. An experimental evaluation indicates that the approach is a potentially useful addition to the portfolio of existing approaches to termination analysis. © 2014 Springer International Publishing.

References Powered by Scopus

Abstract interpretation: "A" unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints

4591Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The model checker SPIN

2895Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A complete method for the synthesis of linear ranking functions

314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

T2: Temporal property verification

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analyzing runtime and size complexity of integer programs

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fairness modulo theory: A new approach to LTL software model checking

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heizmann, M., Hoenicke, J., & Podelski, A. (2014). Termination analysis by learning terminating programs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8559 LNCS, pp. 797–813). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08867-9_53

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘18‘20‘21‘2200.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 6

86%

Engineering 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0