Stratification, Dependence, and Nonanthropocentrism: Nicolai Hartmann’s Critical Ontology

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter argues, provocatively, that among all those who proposed a new ontology during the general revival of ontology at the start of the twentieth century, Hartmann was the only thinker to have actually developed one, and one that may fulfill the promise of an ontology of nature. Hartmann’s critical ontology effectively challenges anthropocentrism because his conception of a stratified reality acknowledges the asymmetrical dependence of humans on nonhuman biotic and abiotic nature. Given that, for Hartmann, all relations (organic, psychological, material, cultural, etc.) count, his ontology can form the non-reductive basis for a critical environmental philosophy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peterson, K. (2017). Stratification, Dependence, and Nonanthropocentrism: Nicolai Hartmann’s Critical Ontology. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 92, pp. 159–180). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66236-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free